Solution & Explanation
### Related Formula
textFor a quadratic equation A x^2 + B x + C = 0 text to have two positive real roots:$$\text{For a quadratic equation } A x^2 + B x + C = 0 \text{ to have two positive real roots:}$$
text1. Real roots: D = B^2 - 4AC ge 0$$\text{1. Real roots: } D = B^2 - 4AC \ge 0$$
text2. Sum of roots: -fracBA > 0$$\text{2. Sum of roots: } -\frac{B}{A} > 0$$
text3. Product of roots: fracCA > 0$$\text{3. Product of roots: } \frac{C}{A} > 0$$
### Core Logic
We write down three systems of inequalities based on real and positive root conditions, find their intersection, and map the boundaries to solve for the parameters.
### Step 1: Apply the discriminant condition (Real roots)
For real roots, the discriminant D ge 0$D \ge 0$:
D = left[ 2(a - 3) right]^2 - 4(1 - a)(9) ge 0$$D = \left[ 2(a - 3) \right]^2 - 4(1 - a)(9) \ge 0$$
4(a^2 - 6a + 9) - 36(1 - a) ge 0$$4(a^2 - 6a + 9) - 36(1 - a) \ge 0$$
(a^2 - 6a + 9) - 9(1 - a) ge 0$$(a^2 - 6a + 9) - 9(1 - a) \ge 0$$
a^2 - 6a + 9 - 9 + 9 a ge 0$$a^2 - 6a + 9 - 9 + 9 a \ge 0$$
a^2 + 3a ge 0 implies a(a + 3) ge 0$$a^2 + 3a \ge 0 \implies a(a + 3) \ge 0$$
Thus, the interval is:
a in (-infty, -3] cup [0, infty) quad text--- (1)$$a \in (-\infty, -3] \cup [0, \infty) \quad \text{--- (1)}$$
### Step 2: Apply the sum of roots condition (Positive sum)
For positive roots, the sum of roots must be positive:
-fracBA = frac-2(a - 3)1 - a = frac2(a - 3)a - 1 > 0$$-\frac{B}{A} = \frac{-2(a - 3)}{1 - a} = \frac{2(a - 3)}{a - 1} > 0$$
Using the wavy curve method for fraca-3a-1 > 0$\frac{a-3}{a-1} > 0$:
a in (-infty, 1) cup (3, infty) quad text--- (2)$$a \in (-\infty, 1) \cup (3, \infty) \quad \text{--- (2)}$$
### Step 3: Apply the product of roots condition (Positive product)
For positive roots, the product of roots must be positive:
fracCA = frac91 - a > 0 implies 1 - a > 0 implies a < 1$$\frac{C}{A} = \frac{9}{1 - a} > 0 \implies 1 - a > 0 \implies a < 1$$
Thus, the interval is:
a in (-infty, 1) quad text--- (3)$$a \in (-\infty, 1) \quad \text{--- (3)}$$
### Step 4: Find the intersection of all conditions
Intersecting equations (1), (2), and (3):
- First, intersect (2) and (3):
( (-infty, 1) cup (3, infty) ) cap (-infty, 1) = (-infty, 1)$$( (-\infty, 1) \cup (3, \infty) ) \cap (-\infty, 1) = (-\infty, 1)$$
- Next, intersect with (1):
( (-infty, -3] cup [0, infty) ) cap (-infty, 1) = (-infty, -3] cup [0, 1)$$( (-\infty, -3] \cup [0, \infty) ) \cap (-\infty, 1) = (-\infty, -3] \cup [0, 1)$$
Comparing this with (-infty, -alpha] cup [beta, gamma)$(-\infty, -\alpha] \cup [\beta, \gamma)$:
- alpha = 3$\alpha = 3$
- beta = 0$\beta = 0$
- gamma = 1$\gamma = 1$
Now calculate the target sum:
2alpha + beta + gamma = 2(3) + 0 + 1 = 7$$2\alpha + \beta + \gamma = 2(3) + 0 + 1 = 7$$
### Pattern Recognition
Location of roots: When both roots are positive, checking sum and product signs along with D ge 0$D \ge 0$ is the standard and fastest set of inequalities, avoiding complex vertex projections.
### Evaluation Rubric / Model Answer
null
### Chapter Mix
Class 11 Chemistry: Practical Chemistry
More Complex Numbers and Quadratic Equations Previous-Year Questions — Page 6
Q23
jee_main_2024_29_jan_morning
Higher Powers of Roots
Let
alpha, beta$\alpha, \beta$ be the
roots of the equation x^2-x+2=0$x^2-x+2=0$ with
Im(alpha) gt Im(beta)$Im(\alpha) \gt Im(\beta)$. Then
alpha^6+alpha^4+beta^4-5alpha^2$\alpha^6+\alpha^4+\beta^4-5\alpha^2$ is equal to
Numerical Answer. Answer: 13 to 13
Solution
### Related Formula
Since alpha$\alpha$ is a root of x^2 - x + 2 = 0$x^2 - x + 2 = 0$, it must satisfy the equation exactly:
alpha^2 - alpha + 2 = 0 Rightarrow alpha^2 = alpha - 2$$\alpha^2 - \alpha + 2 = 0 \Rightarrow \alpha^2 = \alpha - 2$$
This is an essential root reduction property allowing polynomials of high degrees to be collapsed linearly.
### Core Logic
We need to evaluate the expression E = alpha^6 + alpha^4 + beta^4 - 5alpha^2$E = \alpha^6 + \alpha^4 + \beta^4 - 5\alpha^2$.
Use the substitution alpha^2 = alpha - 2$\alpha^2 = \alpha - 2$ to iteratively depress the powers of alpha$\alpha$.
alpha^4 = (alpha^2)^2 = (alpha - 2)^2 = alpha^2 - 4alpha + 4$$\alpha^4 = (\alpha^2)^2 = (\alpha - 2)^2 = \alpha^2 - 4\alpha + 4$$
Substitute alpha^2 = alpha - 2$\alpha^2 = \alpha - 2$ again into the result:
alpha^4 = (alpha - 2) - 4alpha + 4 = -3alpha + 2$$\alpha^4 = (\alpha - 2) - 4\alpha + 4 = -3\alpha + 2$$
Now, generate alpha^6$\alpha^6$ using alpha^4$\alpha^4$:
alpha^6 = alpha^4 cdot alpha^2 = (-3alpha + 2)(alpha - 2) = -3alpha^2 + 6alpha + 2alpha - 4 = -3alpha^2 + 8alpha - 4$$\alpha^6 = \alpha^4 \cdot \alpha^2 = (-3\alpha + 2)(\alpha - 2) = -3\alpha^2 + 6\alpha + 2\alpha - 4 = -3\alpha^2 + 8\alpha - 4$$
Substitute alpha^2 = alpha - 2$\alpha^2 = \alpha - 2$ into the result again:
alpha^6 = -3(alpha - 2) + 8alpha - 4 = -3alpha + 6 + 8alpha - 4 = 5alpha + 2$$\alpha^6 = -3(\alpha - 2) + 8\alpha - 4 = -3\alpha + 6 + 8\alpha - 4 = 5\alpha + 2$$
### Step 1: Simplify the Full Expression
The symmetry of the roots dictates that beta^4$\beta^4$ behaves identically to alpha^4$\alpha^4$. Thus:
beta^4 = -3beta + 2$$\beta^4 = -3\beta + 2$$
Substitute all depressed linear forms back into E = alpha^6 + alpha^4 + beta^4 - 5alpha^2$E = \alpha^6 + \alpha^4 + \beta^4 - 5\alpha^2$:
E = (5alpha + 2) + (-3alpha + 2) + (-3beta + 2) - 5(alpha - 2)$$E = (5\alpha + 2) + (-3\alpha + 2) + (-3\beta + 2) - 5(\alpha - 2)$$
E = 5alpha - 3alpha - 5alpha - 3beta + 2 + 2 + 2 + 10$$E = 5\alpha - 3\alpha - 5\alpha - 3\beta + 2 + 2 + 2 + 10$$
E = -3alpha - 3beta + 16$$E = -3\alpha - 3\beta + 16$$
E = -3(alpha + beta) + 16$$E = -3(\alpha + \beta) + 16$$
### Step 2: Apply Sum of Roots
From the original quadratic equation x^2 - x + 2 = 0$x^2 - x + 2 = 0$, the sum of roots is:
alpha + beta = -frac-11 = 1$$\alpha + \beta = -\frac{-1}{1} = 1$$
Substitute this back:
E = -3(1) + 16 = 13$$E = -3(1) + 16 = 13$$
(Note: The condition Im(alpha) gt Im(beta)$Im(\alpha) \gt Im(\beta)$ was a distractor since the expression simplified perfectly symmetrically into alpha + beta$\alpha + \beta$ without needing the individual complex values of the roots).
### Pattern Recognition
Never compute De Moivre polar forms for high root powers unless the quadratic has roots like omega$\omega$ or i$i$. Always use the characteristic quadratic relation alpha^2 = palpha + q$\alpha^2 = p\alpha + q$ to rapidly step down degrees until everything is strictly linear.
### Evaluation Rubric / Model Answer
null
### Chapter Mix
Class 11 Mathematics: Complex Numbers and Quadratic Equations
Q16
jee_main_2024_30_january_evening
Roots of Unity
If z$z$ is a complex number, then the number of common roots of the equation z^1985 + z^100 + 1 = 0$z^{1985} + z^{100} + 1 = 0$ and z^3 + 2z^2 + 2z + 1 = 0$z^3 + 2z^2 + 2z + 1 = 0$ , is equal to:
- A. 1$1$
- B. 2$2$
- C. 0$0$
- D. 3$3$
Solution
### Related Formula
z^3-1 = (z-1)(z^2+z+1) quad textCube roots of unity: 1, omega, omega^2$$z^3-1 = (z-1)(z^2+z+1) \quad \text{Cube roots of unity: } 1, \omega, \omega^2$$
omega^3 = 1 quad textand quad 1+omega+omega^2 = 0$$\omega^3 = 1 \quad \text{and} \quad 1+\omega+\omega^2 = 0$$
### Core Logic
Let's first find the roots of the lower degree polynomial:
z^3 + 2z^2 + 2z + 1 = 0$$z^3 + 2z^2 + 2z + 1 = 0$$
Group the terms:
(z^3 + 1) + 2z(z + 1) = 0$$(z^3 + 1) + 2z(z + 1) = 0$$
(z + 1)(z^2 - z + 1) + 2z(z + 1) = 0$$(z + 1)(z^2 - z + 1) + 2z(z + 1) = 0$$
(z + 1)(z^2 - z + 1 + 2z) = 0$$(z + 1)(z^2 - z + 1 + 2z) = 0$$
(z + 1)(z^2 + z + 1) = 0$$(z + 1)(z^2 + z + 1) = 0$$
Thus, the roots are z = -1$z = -1$, and the roots of z^2 + z + 1 = 0$z^2 + z + 1 = 0$ which are z = omega, omega^2$z = \omega, \omega^2$.
### Step 1: Check z = -1
Substitute z = -1$z = -1$ into the first equation z^1985 + z^100 + 1 = 0$z^{1985} + z^{100} + 1 = 0$:
(-1)^1985 + (-1)^100 + 1 = -1 + 1 + 1 = 1 neq 0$$(-1)^{1985} + (-1)^{100} + 1 = -1 + 1 + 1 = 1 \neq 0$$
So, z = -1$z = -1$ is not a common root.
### Step 2: Check z = ω and ω²
Substitute z = omega$z = \omega$:
omega^1985 + omega^100 + 1$$\omega^{1985} + \omega^{100} + 1$$
Reduce the powers modulo 3 (since omega^3 = 1$\omega^3 = 1$):
1985 = 3 times 661 + 2 Rightarrow omega^1985 = omega^2$1985 = 3 \times 661 + 2 \Rightarrow \omega^{1985} = \omega^2$
100 = 3 times 33 + 1 Rightarrow omega^100 = omega^1 = omega$100 = 3 \times 33 + 1 \Rightarrow \omega^{100} = \omega^1 = \omega$
So, omega^1985 + omega^100 + 1 = omega^2 + omega + 1 = 0$\omega^{1985} + \omega^{100} + 1 = \omega^2 + \omega + 1 = 0$.
z = omega$z = \omega$ is a common root.
Substitute z = omega^2$z = \omega^2$:
(omega^2)^1985 + (omega^2)^100 + 1 = omega^3970 + omega^200 + 1$$(\omega^2)^{1985} + (\omega^2)^{100} + 1 = \omega^{3970} + \omega^{200} + 1$$
3970 = 3 times 1323 + 1 Rightarrow omega^3970 = omega$3970 = 3 \times 1323 + 1 \Rightarrow \omega^{3970} = \omega$
200 = 3 times 66 + 2 Rightarrow omega^200 = omega^2$200 = 3 \times 66 + 2 \Rightarrow \omega^{200} = \omega^2$
So, omega^3970 + omega^200 + 1 = omega + omega^2 + 1 = 0$\omega^{3970} + \omega^{200} + 1 = \omega + \omega^2 + 1 = 0$.
z = omega^2$z = \omega^2$ is also a common root.
### Step 3: Conclusion
There are exactly 2 common roots: omega$\omega$ and omega^2$\omega^2$.
### Pattern Recognition
Whenever z^2+z+1$z^2+z+1$ emerges as a factor, its roots omega$\omega$ and omega^2$\omega^2$ can be directly tested in massive degree polynomials using exponent reduction modulo 3.
### Evaluation Rubric / Model Answer
null
### Chapter Mix
Class 11 Maths: Complex Numbers
Q3
jee_main_2024_30_jan_morning
Modulus and Conjugate of a Complex Number
If z = x + iy$z = x + iy$, xy neq 0$xy \neq 0$, satisfies the equation z^2 + ibarz = 0$z^2 + i\bar{z} = 0$, then |z^2|$|z^2|$ is equal to:
- A. 9$9$
- B. 1$1$
- C. 4$4$
- D. frac14$\frac{1}{4}$
Solution
### Related Formula
|z^n| = |z|^n$|z^n| = |z|^n$
|barz| = |z|$|\bar{z}| = |z|$
### Core Logic
Given the equation:
z^2 = -ibarz$z^2 = -i\bar{z}$
Taking the modulus on both sides:
|z^2| = |-ibarz|$$|z^2| = |-i\bar{z}|$$
Using properties of modulus:
|z|^2 = |-i| cdot |barz|$$|z|^2 = |-i| \cdot |\bar{z}|$$
Since |-i| = 1$|-i| = 1$ and |barz| = |z|$|\bar{z}| = |z|$:
|z|^2 = |z|$|z|^2 = |z|$
|z|^2 - |z| = 0$|z|^2 - |z| = 0$
|z|(|z| - 1) = 0$$|z|(|z| - 1) = 0$$
### Step 1: Applying the non-zero condition
This gives two possibilities: |z| = 0$|z| = 0$ or |z| = 1$|z| = 1$.
Since z = x + iy$z = x + iy$ and xy neq 0$xy \neq 0$, neither x$x$ nor y$y$ is zero, which implies |z| neq 0$|z| \neq 0$.
Therefore, |z| = 1$|z| = 1$.
We are asked for |z^2|$|z^2|$:
|z^2| = |z|^2 = 1^2 = 1$$|z^2| = |z|^2 = 1^2 = 1$$
### Pattern Recognition
When dealing with equations involving z$z$ and barz$\bar{z}$, applying modulus to both sides rapidly simplifies the problem, turning complex equations into simple real algebraic equations in |z|$|z|$.
### Evaluation Rubric / Model Answer
null
### Chapter Mix
Class 11 Maths: Complex Numbers and Quadratic Equations
Q28
jee_main_2024_30_jan_morning
Quadratic Equations
Let
alpha, beta in mathbbN$\alpha, \beta \in \mathbb{N}$ be
roots of equation x^2 - 70x + lambda = 0$x^2 - 70x + \lambda = 0$ where
fraclambda2, fraclambda3 notin mathbbN$\frac{\lambda}{2}, \frac{\lambda}{3} \notin \mathbb{N}$. If
lambda$\lambda$ assumes the minimum possible value, then
frac(sqrtalpha - 1 + sqrtbeta - 1)(lambda + 35)|alpha - beta|$\frac{(\sqrt{\alpha - 1} + \sqrt{\beta - 1})(\lambda + 35)}{|\alpha - \beta|}$ is equal to:
Numerical Answer. Answer: 60 to 60
Solution
### Related Formula
textSum of roots (alpha + beta) = -fracba$$\text{Sum of roots } (\alpha + \beta) = -\frac{b}{a}$$
textProduct of roots (alpha beta) = fracca$$\text{Product of roots } (\alpha \beta) = \frac{c}{a}$$
### Core Logic
For the equation x^2 - 70x + lambda = 0$x^2 - 70x + \lambda = 0$:
alpha + beta = 70$\alpha + \beta = 70$
alpha beta = lambda$\alpha \beta = \lambda$
Since alpha, beta in mathbbN$\alpha, \beta \in \mathbb{N}$, their sum is 70. This gives alpha(70 - alpha) = lambda$\alpha(70 - \alpha) = \lambda$.
We are given lambda / 2 notin mathbbN$\lambda / 2 \notin \mathbb{N}$ and lambda / 3 notin mathbbN$\lambda / 3 \notin \mathbb{N}$.
This means lambda$\lambda$ is not divisible by 2 or 3. So lambda$\lambda$ must be an odd number and not a multiple of 3.
Thus, neither alpha$\alpha$ nor beta$\beta$ can be a multiple of 2 or 3.
### Step 1: Finding minimum lambda
We need to find the minimum value of lambda$\lambda$. lambda = alpha(70 - alpha)$\lambda = \alpha(70 - \alpha)$.
This parabola opens downwards, so the minimum product occurs when the integers alpha$\alpha$ and beta$\beta$ are as far apart as possible.
Let's test small values for alpha$\alpha$:
If alpha = 1$\alpha = 1$, beta = 69 Rightarrow lambda = 69$\beta = 69 \Rightarrow \lambda = 69$, but 69 = 3 times 23$69 = 3 \times 23$, which is divisible by 3. Rejected.
If alpha = 2$\alpha = 2$, divisible by 2. Rejected.
If alpha = 3$\alpha = 3$, divisible by 3. Rejected.
If alpha = 4$\alpha = 4$, divisible by 2. Rejected.
If alpha = 5$\alpha = 5$, beta = 65 Rightarrow lambda = 325$\beta = 65 \Rightarrow \lambda = 325$.
Check divisibility: 325 is odd (not div by 2). 3+2+5 = 10$3+2+5 = 10$ (not div by 3).
So minimum lambda = 325$\lambda = 325$ with roots alpha = 5, beta = 65$\alpha = 5, \beta = 65$.
### Step 2: Evaluating the target expression
We need to compute:
E = frac(sqrtalpha - 1 + sqrtbeta - 1)(lambda + 35)|alpha - beta|$$E = \frac{(\sqrt{\alpha - 1} + \sqrt{\beta - 1})(\lambda + 35)}{|\alpha - \beta|}$$
Substitute the values alpha = 5$\alpha = 5$, beta = 65$\beta = 65$, lambda = 325$\lambda = 325$:
|alpha - beta| = |5 - 65| = 60$$|\alpha - \beta| = |5 - 65| = 60$$
sqrtalpha - 1 = sqrt4 = 2$$\sqrt{\alpha - 1} = \sqrt{4} = 2$$
sqrtbeta - 1 = sqrt64 = 8$$\sqrt{\beta - 1} = \sqrt{64} = 8$$
E = frac(2 + 8)(325 + 35)60 = frac(10)(360)60 = 10 times 6 = 60$$E = \frac{(2 + 8)(325 + 35)}{60} = \frac{(10)(360)}{60} = 10 \times 6 = 60$$
The result is exactly 60.
### Pattern Recognition
Minimizing the product of two numbers with a fixed sum requires them to be as far apart as possible. Divisibility constraints are quickly verified using prime modulus filters (%2 neq 0$%2 \neq 0$, %3 neq 0$%3 \neq 0$).
### Evaluation Rubric / Model Answer
null
### Chapter Mix
Class 11 Maths: Complex Numbers and Quadratic Equations
Q3
jee_main_2024_31_jan_evening
Algebra of Complex Numbers
Let
z_1$z_1$ and
z_2$z_2$ be two
complex numbers such that
z_1 + z_2 = 5$z_1 + z_2 = 5$ and
z_1^3 + z_2^3 = 20 + 15i$z_1^3 + z_2^3 = 20 + 15i$. Then
|z_1^4 + z_2^4|$|z_1^4 + z_2^4|$ equals-
- A. 30sqrt3$30\sqrt{3}$
- B. 75$75$
- C. 15sqrt15$15\sqrt{15}$
- D. 25sqrt3$25\sqrt{3}$
Solution
### Related Formula
a^3+b^3 = (a+b)^3 - 3ab(a+b)$$a^3+b^3 = (a+b)^3 - 3ab(a+b)$$
a^2+b^2 = (a+b)^2 - 2ab$$a^2+b^2 = (a+b)^2 - 2ab$$
a^4+b^4 = (a^2+b^2)^2 - 2a^2b^2$$a^4+b^4 = (a^2+b^2)^2 - 2a^2b^2$$
### Core Logic
Given
z_1+z_2=5$z_1+z_2=5$ and
z_1^3+z_2^3=20+15i$z_1^3+z_2^3=20+15i$.
z_1^3+z_2^3 = (z_1+z_2)^3 - 3z_1z_2(z_1+z_2)$$z_1^3+z_2^3 = (z_1+z_2)^3 - 3z_1z_2(z_1+z_2)$$
20+15i = 125 - 15z_1z_2$$20+15i = 125 - 15z_1z_2$$
15z_1z_2 = 105 - 15i implies z_1z_2 = 7-i$$15z_1z_2 = 105 - 15i \implies z_1z_2 = 7-i$$
Now, compute
z_1^2+z_2^2$z_1^2+z_2^2$:
z_1^2+z_2^2 = (z_1+z_2)^2 - 2z_1z_2 = 25 - 2(7-i) = 11+2i$$z_1^2+z_2^2 = (z_1+z_2)^2 - 2z_1z_2 = 25 - 2(7-i) = 11+2i$$
Now, compute
z_1^4+z_2^4$z_1^4+z_2^4$:
z_1^4+z_2^4 = (z_1^2+z_2^2)^2 - 2(z_1z_2)^2$$z_1^4+z_2^4 = (z_1^2+z_2^2)^2 - 2(z_1z_2)^2$$
= (11+2i)^2 - 2(7-i)^2$$= (11+2i)^2 - 2(7-i)^2$$
= (121 - 4 + 44i) - 2(49 - 1 - 14i)$$= (121 - 4 + 44i) - 2(49 - 1 - 14i)$$
= 117 + 44i - 2(48 - 14i)$$= 117 + 44i - 2(48 - 14i)$$
= 117 + 44i - 96 + 28i = 21 + 72i$$= 117 + 44i - 96 + 28i = 21 + 72i$$
Finally, find magnitude:
|z_1^4+z_2^4| = |21+72i| = sqrt21^2 + 72^2 = sqrt441 + 5184 = sqrt5625 = 75$$|z_1^4+z_2^4| = |21+72i| = \sqrt{21^2 + 72^2} = \sqrt{441 + 5184} = \sqrt{5625} = 75$$
### Pattern Recognition
Standard algebraic identities recursively applied. Extract sum and product, then ladder up to higher powers.
### Evaluation Rubric / Model Answer
null
### Chapter Mix
Class 11 Maths:
Complex Numbers and Quadratic Equations