Related Formula
adj(adj(A)) = |A|ⁿ⁻² A$$\text{adj}(\text{adj}(A)) = |A|^{n-2} A$$
θ + (θ + (2π)/(3)) + (θ + (4π)/(3)) = 0$$\sin \theta + \sin \left(\theta + \frac{2\pi}{3}\right) + \sin \left(\theta + \frac{4\pi}{3}\right) = 0$$
Core Logic
Let x θ = y (θ +(2π)/(3)) = z (θ +(4π)/(3)) = λ$x\sin \theta = y\sin \left(\theta +\frac{2\pi}{3}\right) = z\sin \left(\theta +\frac{4\pi}{3}\right) = \lambda$.
Since λ ≠ 0$\lambda \neq 0$, none of x, y, z$x, y, z$ can be zero. Therefore, x = (λ)/( θ), y = (λ)/( (θ + 2π/3)), z = (λ)/( (θ + 4π/3))$x = \frac{\lambda}{\sin\theta}, y = \frac{\lambda}{\sin(\theta + 2\pi/3)}, z = \frac{\lambda}{\sin(\theta + 4\pi/3)}$.
Step 1: Evaluating Statement (I)
The fundamental identity states that θ + (θ + 120^°) + (θ + 240^°) = 0$\sin\theta + \sin(\theta + 120^\circ) + \sin(\theta + 240^\circ) = 0$.
Trace (R) = x + y + z$(R) = x + y + z$.
x + y + z = λ ( (1)/( θ) + (1)/( (θ + 2π/3)) + (1)/( (θ + 4π/3)) )$$x + y + z = \lambda \left( \frac{1}{\sin\theta} + \frac{1}{\sin(\theta + 2\pi/3)} + \frac{1}{\sin(\theta + 4\pi/3)} \right)$$
Summing these fractions produces the sum of products of pairs of sines in the numerator:
Numerator = (θ+120^°) (θ+240^°) + θ (θ+240^°) + θ (θ+120^°)$$\text{Numerator } = \sin(\theta+120^\circ)\sin(\theta+240^\circ) + \sin\theta\sin(\theta+240^\circ) + \sin\theta\sin(\theta+120^\circ)$$
Using sum to product formulas, this simplifies to -(3)/(4) ≠ 0$-\frac{3}{4} \neq 0$ for general θ$\theta$. Thus, x+y+z ≠ 0$x+y+z \neq 0$.
Statement (I) is FALSE.
Step 2: Evaluating Statement (II)
For a 3 × 3$3 \times 3$ matrix, adj(adj(R)) = |R|³⁻² R = |R|R$\text{adj}(\text{adj}(R)) = |R|^{3-2} R = |R|R$.
|R| = xyz$|R| = xyz$.
Trace (adj(adj(R))) = |R| · Trace(R) = xyz(x + y + z)$(\text{adj}(\text{adj}(R))) = |R| \cdot \text{Trace}(R) = xyz(x + y + z)$.
From the given condition, x, y, z ≠ 0$x, y, z \neq 0$, meaning |R| = xyz ≠ 0$|R| = xyz \neq 0$. As shown above, x+y+z ≠ 0$x+y+z \neq 0$ as well.
Hence, Trace (adj(adj(R))) ≠ 0$(\text{adj}(\text{adj}(R))) \neq 0$.
Because the hypothesis "If trace (adj(adj(R))) = 0$(\text{adj}(\text{adj}(R))) = 0$" is strictly false, the implication itself is vacuously true in propositional logic. (False $\implies$ Anything is True).
Statement (II) is TRUE.
Pattern Recognition
Propositional logic strictly dictates that an 'If P then Q' statement evaluates to True if the premise P is inherently impossible (vacuous truth). Calculating the adj-adj trace purely checks for premise invalidity.
Chapter Mix
Class 12 Maths: Matrices and Determinants