Coordination Compounds Previous Year Questions — JEE Main Chemistry

68 past-year Coordination Compounds questions from JEE Main (Chemistry) — page 11.

Q63 (2026)

Given below are two statements: Statement I: Crystal Field Stabilization Energy (CFSE) of $[\text{Cr}(\text{H}_2\text{O})_6]^{2+}$ is greater than that of $[\text{Mn}(\text{H}_2\text{O})_6]^{2+}$. Statement II: Potassium ferricyanide has a greater spin-only magnetic moment than sodium ferrocyanide. In the light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below:
  1. $(1) \ \text{Both Statement I and Statement II are true}$
  2. $(2) \ \text{Both Statement I and Statement II are false}$
  3. $(3) \text{Statement I is true but Statement II is false}$
  4. $(4) \ \text{Statement I is false but Statement II is true}$
### Core Logic - Statement I: $[\text{Mn}(\text{H}_2\text{O})_6]^{2+}$ has $d^5$ configuration with weak field ligands (CFSE = 0), whereas $[\text{Cr}(\text{H}_2\text{O})_6]^{2+}$ has $d^4$ configuration (CFSE $= -0.6\Delta_0$). Thus CFSE of chromium complex is greater in magnitude. - Statement II: Potassium ferricyanide $\text{K}_3[\text{Fe}(\text{CN})_6]$ has $Fe^{3+}$ ($d^5$, 1 unpaired electron, $\mu = \sqrt{3}$ B.M.), while sodium ferrocyanide $\text{Na}_4[\text{Fe}(\text{CN})_6]$ has $\text{Fe}^{2+}$ ($d^6$, 0 unpaired electrons, $\mu = 0$). Thus statement II is true. ### Step 1: Final Conclusion Both statements are true, corresponding to option (1). ### Pattern Recognition Sees: CFSE calculations and magnetic moment comparisons for coordination complexes. Trap: Miscalculating $d$-electron count or ligand field strength. ### Chapter Mix Class 12 Chemistry: Coordination Compounds

Q74 (2026)

Identify the metal ions among $\text{Co}^{2+}$, $\text{Ni}^{2+}$, $\text{Fe}^{2+}$, $\text{V}^{3+}$ and $\text{Ti}^{2+}$ having a spin-only magnetic moment value more than $3.0 \text{ BM}$. The sum of unpaired electrons present in the high spin octahedral complexes formed by those metal ions is \_\_\_\_.
### Core Logic Let's check the $d$-electron configurations and number of unpaired electrons ($n$) in high spin octahedral complexes: - $\text{V}^{3+} \rightarrow 3d^2$ ($n = 2, \mu = \sqrt{8} \approx 2.83 \text{ BM}$) - $\text{Ti}^{2+} \rightarrow 3d^2$ ($n = 2, \mu = 2.83 \text{ BM}$) - $\text{Ni}^{2+} \rightarrow 3d^8$ ($n = 2, \mu = 2.83 \text{ BM}$) - $\text{Fe}^{2+} \rightarrow 3d^6$ ($n = 4, \mu = \sqrt{24} \approx 4.9 \text{ BM} > 3 \text{ BM}$) - $\text{Co}^{2+} \rightarrow 3d^7$ ($n = 3, \mu = \sqrt{15} \approx 3.87 \text{ BM} > 3 \text{ BM}$) ### Step 1: Summing Unpaired Electrons Only $\text{Fe}^{2+}$ ($n = 4$) and $\text{Co}^{2+}$ ($n = 3$) have magnetic moments $> 3.0 \text{ BM}$. Sum of unpaired electrons $= 4 + 3 = 7$. ### Pattern Recognition Sees: high spin octahedral complexes and spin-only magnetic moment threshold checks. Trap: Misidentifying high-spin versus low-spin electron pairing in $d^6$ or $d^7$ configurations. ### Chapter Mix Class 12 Chemistry: Coordination Compounds

Q51 (2026)

Consider the transition metal ions $Mn^{3+}$, $Cr^{3+}$, $Fe^{3+}$ and $Co^{3+}$ and all form low spin octahedral complexes. The correct decreasing order of unpaired electrons in their respective d-orbitals of the complexes is
  1. $Cr^{3+} > Fe^{3+} > Co^{3+} > Mn^{3+}$
  2. $Mn^{3+} > Fe^{3+} > Co^{3+} > Cr^{3+}$
  3. $Fe^{3+} > Co^{3+} > Mn^{3+} > Cr^{3+}$
  4. $Cr^{3+} > Mn^{3+} > Fe^{3+} > Co^{3+}$
### Related Formula For low spin octahedral complexes, electrons pair up in the $t_{2g}$ orbitals before occupying $e_{g}$ orbitals. Configuration follows the splitting $t_{2g}$ (lower energy) and $e_{g}$ (higher energy). ### Core Logic Analyze the electronic configuration of each ion in a strong field (low spin) environment: 1. $Co^{3+} \rightarrow 3d^{6} \Rightarrow t_{2g}^{2,2,2} e_{g}^{0,0}$ Unpaired electrons = 0 2. $Fe^{3+} \rightarrow 3d^{5} \Rightarrow t_{2g}^{2,2,1} e_{g}^{0,0}$ Unpaired electrons = 1 3. $Cr^{3+} \rightarrow 3d^{3} \Rightarrow t_{2g}^{1,1,1} e_{g}^{0,0}$ Unpaired electrons = 3 4. $Mn^{3+} \rightarrow 3d^{4} \Rightarrow t_{2g}^{2,1,1} e_{g}^{0,0}$ Unpaired electrons = 2 ### Step 1: Final Conclusion Arranging in decreasing order of unpaired electrons: $Cr^{3+} (3) > Mn^{3+} (2) > Fe^{3+} (1) > Co^{3+} (0)$ ### Pattern Recognition For low spin $d^4$ to $d^7$ configurations, pairing occurs early. $d^3$ ($Cr^{3+}$) always has 3 unpaired electrons regardless of field strength, making it the highest among these. ### Evaluation Rubric / Model Answer null ### Chapter Mix Class 12 Chemistry: Coordination Compounds Class 12 Chemistry: d and f Block Elements

Q66 (2026)

$[\text{Ni}(\text{PPh}_3)_2\text{Cl}_2]$ is a paramagnetic complex. Identify the INCORRECT statements about this complex. A. The complex exhibits geometrical isomerism. B. The complex is white in colour. C. The calculated spin-only magnetic moment of the complex is 2.84 BM. D. The calculated CFSE (Crystal Field Stabilization Energy) of Ni in this complex is $-0.8\Delta_t$. E. The geometrical arrangement of ligands in this complex is similar to that in $\text{Ni}(\text{CO})_4$. Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
  1. A and B only
  2. A, B and D only
  3. C and D only
  4. C, D and E only
### Related Formula $$\text{For } \text{Ni}^{2+} (3d^8) \text{ in tetrahedral field: configuration is } e^4 t_2^4$$ $$\text{CFSE} = \left(-0.6 n_e + 0.4 n_{t_2}\right) \Delta_t = \left(-0.6 \times 4 + 0.4 \times 4\right) \Delta_t = -0.8 \Delta_t$$ $$\mu_s = \sqrt{n(n+2)} = \sqrt{2(4)} = \sqrt{8} \approx 2.83\text{ BM}$$ ### Core Logic Step 1: Paramagnetic $[\text{Ni}(\text{PPh}_3)_2\text{Cl}_2]$ has tetrahedral geometry ($sp^3$). Step 2: Evaluate Statements: - Statement A: Tetrahedral complexes of type $\text{MA}_2\text{B}_2$ do NOT exhibit geometrical isomerism. (Statement A is INCORRECT) - Statement B: The complex is intense blue in color, not white. (Statement B is INCORRECT) - Statement C: $\text{Ni}^{2+} (3d^8)$ has 2 unpaired electrons $\implies \mu = 2.83\text{ BM}$. (Statement C is CORRECT) - Statement D: CFSE for $e^4 t_2^4$ configuration is $-0.8\Delta_t$ (in PDF noted error comparison vs $\Delta_o$). (Statement D is listed as INCORRECT in key) - Statement E: Geometry is tetrahedral, matching $\text{Ni}(\text{CO})_4$. (Statement E is CORRECT) Hence, A, B, and D are incorrect statements. ### Pattern Recognition Sees: Paramagnetic $\text{Ni(II)}$ 4-coordinate complex. Shortcut: Paramagnetism confirms tetrahedral geometry $\implies$ no geometrical isomerism possible for tetrahedral structures. ### Evaluation Rubric / Model Answer null ### Chapter Mix Class 12 Chemistry: Coordination Compounds

Q59 (2026)

Given below are two statements: Statement I: $[CoBr_{4}]^{2-}$ ion will absorb light of lower energy than $[CoCl_{4}]^{2-}$ ion. Statement II: In $[CoI_{4}]^{2-}$ ion, the energy separation between the two set of d-orbitals is more than $[CoCl_{4}]^{2-}$ ion. In the light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below :
  1. $\text{Both Statement I and Statement II are false}$
  2. $\text{Statement I is true but Statement II is false}$
  3. $\text{Statement I is false but Statement II is true}$
  4. $\text{Both Statement I and Statement II are true}$
### Core Logic Evaluate the ligand field strength from the spectrochemical series. Halide ligands are weak field ligands, with the order of their strength being $I^- < Br^- < Cl^- < F^-$. ### Step 1: Statement I Evaluation Since $Cl^-$ is a stronger ligand than $Br^-$, the crystal field splitting energy ($\Delta_t$) for $[CoCl_4]^{2-}$ is greater than that of $[CoBr_4]^{2-}$. Energy absorbed ($E$) is directly proportional to $\Delta_t$. Therefore, $[CoBr_4]^{2-}$ will absorb lower energy than $[CoCl_4]^{2-}$. Statement I is True. ### Step 2: Statement II Evaluation Comparing $[CoI_4]^{2-}$ and $[CoCl_4]^{2-}$: $I^-$ is a weaker ligand than $Cl^-$. Therefore, the energy separation ($\Delta_t$) in $[CoI_4]^{2-}$ will be less than in $[CoCl_4]^{2-}$. Statement II states it is more, which is False. ### Pattern Recognition Spectrochemical series memorization shortcut for halides: I Brought Some Cloth (I- < Br- < S2- < Cl-). ### Evaluation Rubric / Model Answer null ### Chapter Mix Class 12 Chemistry: Coordination Compounds
Rankbit System
JEE Physics: Waves (+15.5%) | Electrostatics: Concentric Shells (-29.7%) | Modern Physics: Photoelectric Clones (+34.2%) | Mathematics: Definite Integrals (+18.1%) | Chemistry: Coordination Splitting (-11.4%) | JEE Physics: Waves (+15.5%) | Electrostatics: Concentric Shells (-29.7%) | Modern Physics: Photoelectric Clones (+34.2%) | Mathematics: Definite Integrals (+18.1%) | Chemistry: Coordination Splitting (-11.4%)

Select Your Target Exam

Choose an exam track below to find formulas per chapter and patterns.

Syncing Exam Intelligence

Mapping formulas and patterns across all tracks…

PATH A — FULL LENGTH PRACTICE

Full Mock Test Hub

Simulate real NTA exam conditions with fully tracked mocks. Time yourself against past papers.

Now Live Open
PATH B — TARGETED PRACTICE

Topic-wise Practice Hub

Practice past-year questions one chapter at a time. Pick an exam → subject → chapter and get every PYQ for that topic — pulled together from all past papers — with the chapter's key formulas alongside.

Loading Questions... Browse Topics
Latest from the Blog
View all →

Loading articles...