Let f: R to (0, infty) be a twice differentiable function such that f(3) = 18 , f'(3) = 0 and f''(3) = 4 . Then lim_x to 1 left( log_e left( fracf(2 + x)f(3) right)^frac18(x-1)^2 right) is equal to:

Solution & Explanation

### Related Formula For a limit of 1^infty form, lim_x to a [g(x)]^h(x) equals: e^lim_x to a h(x)[g(x) - 1] ### Core Logic Let T = lim_x to 1 left( fracf(x + 2)f(3) right)^frac18(x - 1)^2. As x to 1, fracf(x+2)f(3) to fracf(3)f(3) = 1. The exponent goes to infty. This is a standard 1^infty form. T = e^lim_x to 1 frac18(x - 1)^2 left( fracf(x + 2) - f(3)f(3) right) ### Step 1: Simplify Exponent Limit Given f(3) = 18: T = e^lim_x to 1 frac18(x - 1)^2 left( fracf(x + 2) - f(3)18 right) T = e^lim_x to 1 fracf(x + 2) - f(3)(x - 1)^2 This is a frac00 form limit. ### Step 2: Apply L'Hopital's Rule Differentiate numerator and denominator w.r.t x: T = e^lim_x to 1 fracf'(x + 2)2(x - 1) This is still a frac00 form since f'(3) = 0. Apply L'Hopital's Rule again: T = e^lim_x to 1 fracf''(x + 2)2 Substitute x = 1: T = e^fracf''(3)2 ### Step 3: Final Calculation Given f''(3) = 4: T = e^frac42 = e^2 The question asks for log_e(T): log_e(T) = log_e(e^2) = 2 ### Pattern Recognition When expanding f(x) around an extrema (f'(a)=0) inside a 1^infty limit form, double L'Hopital isolates the second derivative divided by the Taylor factorial (2! = 2). The limit elegantly shrinks directly to f''(a)/2. ### Evaluation Rubric / Model Answer null ### Chapter Mix Class 11 Maths: Limits and Derivatives Class 12 Maths: Limits, Continuity and Differentiability

Reference Study Guides

More Limits, Continuity and Differentiability Previous-Year Questions — Page 3

Q72 jee_main_2025_29_jan_evening Limits of Definite Integrals
If lim_tto 0left(int_0^1 (3x + 5)^t dxright)^frac1t = fracalpha5eleft(frac85right)^frac23, then alpha is equal to
Numerical Answer. Answer: 64 to 64

Solution

### Related Formula Standard indeterminacy layout resolution rules for limits matching form 1^infty: lim_t to 0 [g(t)]^frac1t = e^lim_t to 0 fracg(t) - 1t ### Core Logic Evaluate structural integration base at boundary limit initialization state t to 0: int_0^1 1 \, dx = 1 This confirms it matches an indeterminate form of type 1^infty. ### Step 1: Apply Taylor Series or L'Hopital's Theorem Compute limits of logarithmic integration properties inside exponential power indices: textExponent Expression = lim_t to 0 fracint_0^1 (3x+5)^t \, dx - 1t Applying L'Hopital's theorem to differentiate the numerator with respect to t yields: int_0^1 (3x+5)^t ln(3x+5) \, dx Evaluating this at t = 0 gives: int_0^1 ln(3x+5) \, dx ### Step 2: Complete the Final Form Match Integrating via parts results in logarithmic value updates: left[ frac(3x+5)ln(3x+5) - (3x+5)3 right]_0^1 = frac8ln 8 - 5ln 5 - 33 Passing components back through exponential foundations transforms terms to: e^frac8ln 8 - 5ln 5 - 33 = left(frac85right)^frac23 cdot left(frac645eright) Comparing with the target expression fracalpha5eleft(frac85 ight)^frac23 isolates the numerical solution directly: alpha = 64 ### Pattern Recognition Treating 1^infty structural transformations using logarithmic derivatives allows managing complex functions containing multiple integral boundaries effectively. ### Evaluation Rubric / Model Answer null ### Chapter Mix Class 11 Mathematics: Limits Class 12 Mathematics: Definite Integration
Q74 jee_main_2025_28_jan_morning Continuity and Differentiability of Piecewise Functions
Let f(x) = begincases 3x, & x < 0 \\ min left\1 + x + [ x ], x + 2 [ x ] right\, & 0 le x le 2 \\ 5, & x > 2 endcases where [.] denotes greatest integer function. If alpha and beta are the number of points, where f is not continuous and is not differentiable, respectively, then alpha + beta equals....
Numerical Answer. Answer: 5 to 5

Solution

### Related Formula A function is discontinuous if left-hand and right-hand limits mismatch at boundary transitions. Non-differentiability occurs at discontinuities or sharp turns. ### Core Logic Simplify the greatest integer component [x] by expanding over integer intervals:
Continuity and Differentiability of Piecewise Functions diagram for Q74 - JEE Main 2025 Morning
Continuity and Differentiability of Piecewise Functions diagram for Q74 - JEE Main 2025 Morning
f(x) = begincases 3x, & x < 0 \\ x, & 0 le x < 1 \\ x + 2, & 1 le x < 2 \\ 5, & x > 2 endcases ### Step 1: Testing Continuity Limits Check continuity at structural boundaries: At x = 0: textLHM = 0, textRHM = 0 implies Continuous. At x = 1: textLHM = 1, textRHM = 3 implies Discontinuous. At x = 2: textLHM = 4, textRHM = 5 implies Discontinuous. Thus, alpha = 2 points of discontinuity (x in \1, 2\). ### Step 2: Testing Differentiability Parameters Discontinuities automatically introduce non-differentiability. Now check smooth corners at the remaining continuous transition x = 0: f^prime(0^-) = 3, quad f^prime(0^+) = 1 implies textNot differentiable at x=0. Thus, beta = 3 points of non-differentiability (x in \0, 1, 2\). alpha + beta = 2 + 3 = 5 ### Pattern Recognition Discontinuities automatically break differentiability. Always count them first before checking derivatives at smooth corner points. ### Evaluation Rubric / Model Answer null ### Chapter Mix Class 12 Maths: Limits, Continuity and Differentiability
Q69 jee_main_2025_03_april_morning Continuity of Piecewise Functions
Let f(x) = begincases (1 + ax)^1/x & , x < 0 \\ 1 + b & , x = 0 \\ frac(x + 4)^1/2 - 2(x + c)^1/3 - 2 & , x > 0 endcases [cite: 680] be continuous at x = 0[cite: 681]. Then mathrme^mathrmacdot b cdot c is equal to[cite: 681]:
  • A. 64
  • B. 72
  • C. 48
  • D. 36

Solution

### Related Formula Continuity definition condition frame: lim_x rightarrow 0^- f(x) = f(0) = lim_x rightarrow 0^+ f(x) ### Core Logic Evaluate Left-Hand Limit (LHL) using standard forms [cite: 1410]: textLHL = lim_x rightarrow 0^- (1+ax)^1/x = e^a [cite: 1410] Given baseline definition states f(0) = 1+b [cite: 1410]. For Right-Hand Limit (RHL) to be finite and valid, the numerator tracking towards 0 means the denominator must also balance towards 0 to avoid divergence [cite: 1411]: lim_x rightarrow 0^+ left[(x+c)^1/3 - 2right] = 0 implies c^1/3 = 2 implies c = 8 [cite: 1414] ### Step 1: Applying L'Hopital's rule to the RHL With c=8, evaluate RHL limit expressions using derivatives [cite: 1411]: textRHL = lim_x rightarrow 0^+ fracfrac12sqrtx+4frac13(x+8)^-2/3 = fracfrac12(2)frac13(8)^-2/3 = fracfrac14frac13 cdot 4 = frac14 cdot 12 = 3 [cite: 1411, 1415] ### Step 2: Equating limits for parameter solutions Equate continuous criteria milestones together [cite: 1416]: e^a = 1 + b = 3 [cite: 1416] e^a = 3 implies b = 2 [cite: 1416] Compute the ultimate target combination product configuration [cite: 1416]: e^a cdot b cdot c = 3 cdot 2 cdot 8 = 48 [cite: 1416] ### Pattern Recognition Determining missing root constants inside indeterminate fraction structures handles calculations swiftly before running formal limits. ### Evaluation Rubric / Model Answer null ### Chapter Mix Class 12 Mathematics: Limits, Continuity and Differentiability
Q52 jee_main_2025_04_april_evening Evaluation of Limits
Let f be a differentiable function on mathbfR such that f(2) = 1, f'(2) = 4. Let lim_x to 0 (f(2 + x))^3/x = e^alpha. Then the number of times the curve y = 4x^3 - 4x^2 - 4(alpha -7)x - alpha meets x-axis is:-
  • A. 2
  • B. 1
  • C. 0
  • D. 3

Solution

### Related Formula For a limit of the form lim_x to 0 [g(x)]^h(x) where g(x) to 1 and h(x) to infty, the limit evaluates to: e^lim_x to 0 h(x)[g(x) - 1] ### Core Logic Given the limit expression: lim_x to 0 (f(2 + x))^3/x = e^alpha Using the standard form as f(2)=1, this transforms to: e^lim_x to 0 frac3x (f(2 + x) - 1) = e^alpha Recognizing the definition of the derivative f'(2) = lim_x to 0 fracf(2+x)-1x: e^3 f'(2) = e^alpha Given f'(2) = 4: e^3(4) = e^12 = e^alpha implies alpha = 12 ### Step 1: Finding Intersection points with x-axis Substitute alpha = 12 into the equation of the curve: y = 4x^3 - 4x^2 - 4(12 - 7)x - 12 y = 4x^3 - 4x^2 - 20x - 12 To find where it meets the x-axis, set y = 0: 4x^3 - 4x^2 - 20x - 12 = 0 implies x^3 - x^2 - 5x - 3 = 0 Testing for rational roots, x = -1 is a root because (-1)^3 - (-1)^2 - 5(-1) - 3 = -1 - 1 + 5 - 3 = 0. ### Step 2: Factoring the cubic polynomial Dividing x^3 - x^2 - 5x - 3 by (x+1) gives: (x + 1)(x^2 - 2x - 3) = 0 (x + 1)(x + 1)(x - 3) = 0 implies (x + 1)^2(x - 3) = 0 The roots are x = -1 (repeated root) and x = 3. Therefore, the distinct real values of x where the curve intersects the x-axis are -1 and 3, meaning it meets the x-axis exactly 2 times. ### Pattern Recognition A repeated root like (x+1)^2 means the curve is tangent to the x-axis at that point, but it still counts as a meeting point. Always count distinct real roots when determining the number of meeting points with the coordinate axes. ### Evaluation Rubric / Model Answer null ### Chapter Mix Class 12 Mathematics: Limits, Continuity and Differentiability Class 11 Mathematics: Theory of Equations
Q57 jee_main_2025_04_april_morning Evaluation of Limits using Expansion
If lim_x to 1^+frac(x - 1)(6 + lambdacos(x - 1)) + musin(1 - x)(x - 1)^3 = -1, where lambda, mu in mathbbR, then \lambda + \mu is equal to
  • A. 18
  • B. 20
  • C. 19
  • D. 17

Solution

### Related Formula Standard Taylor expansions near zero: cos h = 1 - frach^22! + frach^44! - dots sin h = h - frach^33! + frach^55! - dots ### Core Logic Let x - 1 = h, where h to 0^+. The expression transforms into: lim_h to 0frach(6 + lambdacos h) - musin hh^3 = -1 Substitute the expansions into the numerator: lim_h to 0frachleft[6 + lambdaleft(1 - frach^22right)right] - muleft(h - frach^36right)h^3 = -1 lim_h to 0frac(6 + lambda - mu)h + left(-fraclambda2 + fracmu6right)h^3h^3 = -1 ### Step 1: Match Coefficients for Existence For the limit to be finite, the coefficient of h must vanish: 6 + lambda - mu = 0 implies mu - lambda = 6 quad dots (1) Equating the h^3 term to the given limit value: -fraclambda2 + fracmu6 = -1 implies -3lambda + mu = -6 quad dots (2) ### Step 2: Solve System of Equations Subtract equation (1) from (2): (-3lambda + mu) - (mu - lambda) = -6 - 6 implies -2lambda = -12 implies lambda = 6 From (1), mu = 6 + 6 = 12. lambda + mu = 6 + 12 = 18 ### Pattern Recognition When dealing with indeterminate form limits involving mixed trigonometric expressions with a non-zero denominator power, polynomial substitution using Taylor series is much cleaner and less prone to differentiation tracking mistakes compared to multiple L'Hôpital cycles. ### Evaluation Rubric / Model Answer null ### Chapter Mix Class 12 Mathematics: Limits, Continuity and Differentiability

More Limits, Continuity and Differentiability Questions — jee_main_2026_21_jan_morning

Practice all Limits, Continuity and Differentiability previous-year questions →

Rankbit System
JEE Physics: Waves (+15.5%) | Electrostatics: Concentric Shells (-29.7%) | Modern Physics: Photoelectric Clones (+34.2%) | Mathematics: Definite Integrals (+18.1%) | Chemistry: Coordination Splitting (-11.4%) | JEE Physics: Waves (+15.5%) | Electrostatics: Concentric Shells (-29.7%) | Modern Physics: Photoelectric Clones (+34.2%) | Mathematics: Definite Integrals (+18.1%) | Chemistry: Coordination Splitting (-11.4%)
YOUR FIRST PREP STEP STARTS HERE

We Map Every Repeating Question in Competitive Exams.

Say goodbye to generic mock test fatigue. RankBit uses smart analysis to group past exam questions into their foundational Repeating Question Types. Find chapter weightage, track repeating questions, and score higher with targeted practice.

Select Your Target Exam

Choose an exam track below to find formulas per chapter and patterns.

Syncing Exam Intelligence

Mapping formulas and patterns across all tracks…

PATH A — FULL LENGTH PRACTICE

Full Mock Test Hub

Simulate real NTA exam conditions with fully tracked mocks. Time yourself against past papers.

Now Live Open
PATH B — TARGETED PRACTICE

Topic-wise Practice Hub

Practice past-year questions one chapter at a time. Pick an exam → subject → chapter and get every PYQ for that topic — pulled together from all past papers — with the chapter's key formulas alongside.

Loading Questions... Browse Topics
Latest from the Blog
View all →

Loading articles...