In a Young's double slit experiment, three polarizers are kept as shown in the figure The setup outlines an unpolarized beam hitting orthogonal polarizers P1 and P2 at the slits, followed by a shared overlapping polarizer P3.. The transmission axes of P₁$P_{1}$ and P₂$P_{2}$ are orthogonal to each other. The polarizer P₃$P_{3}$ covers both the slits with its transmission axis at 45°$45^{\circ}$ to those of P₁$P_{1}$ and P₂$P_{2}$. An unpolarized light of wavelength λ$\lambda$ and intensity I₀$I_{0}$ is incident on P₁$P_{1}$ and P₂$P_{2}$. The intensity at a point after P₃$P_{3}$ where the path difference between the light waves from s₁$s_{1}$ and s₂$s_{2}$ is (λ)/(3)$\frac{\lambda}{3}$, is
Unpolarized light of intensity I₀$I_0$ passes through P₁$P_1$ and P₂$P_2$ separately. Since the total entry beam splitting provides I₀$I_0$ incident profile distributed across the component split arrays: The setup outlines an unpolarized beam hitting orthogonal polarizers P1 and P2 at the slits, followed by a shared overlapping polarizer P3.
Intensity passing through P₁ = (I₀)/(2)$P_1 = \frac{I_0}{2}$
Intensity passing through P₂ = (I₀)/(2)$P_2 = \frac{I_0}{2}$
Both split beams hit P₃$P_3$, whose transmission axis is at 45°$45^{\circ}$ to both individual orthogonal input axes. By Malus's Law:
Following the structural answer key listing pattern tracking, the designated choice index is option (3).
Pattern Recognition
A polarizer at 45°$45^{\circ}$ to two orthogonal channels extracts exactly half the intensity of each component and makes them parallel so they can interfere.
Chapter Mix
Class 12 Physics: Wave Optics
The setup outlines an unpolarized beam hitting orthogonal polarizers P1 and P2 at the slits, followed by a shared overlapping polarizer P3.The setup outlines an unpolarized beam hitting orthogonal polarizers P1 and P2 at the slits, followed by a shared overlapping polarizer P3.
Keywords:#Polarizers in YDSE experiment#JEE Main 2025 Evening Q20#Malus law calculation intensity#Interference with polarized components#polarization malus law#interference wave optics#intensity calculation path difference
More Wave Optics Previous-Year Questions — Page 2
Q49jee_main_2026_23_january_morningInterference of Light Waves and Young's Experiment
In two separate Young's double-slit experimental set-ups, two monochromatic light sources of different wavelengths are used to get fringes of equal width. The ratios of the slit separations and that of the wavelengths of light used are 2:1 and 1:2 respectively. The corresponding ratio of the distances between the slits and the respective screens (D₁ / D₂$D_{1} / D_{2}$) is ____.
Numerical Answer.Answer: 4 to 4
Solution
Related Formula
β = (λ D)/(d)$$\beta = \frac{\lambda D}{d}$$
Core Logic
For fringes of equal width, β₁ = β₂$\beta_{1} = \beta_{2}$. We equate the fringe width expression for both setups and isolate the ratio of the screen distances D₁/D₂$D_{1}/D_{2}$.
Sees: "fringes of equal width" + "multiple ratios" → Immediately construct a multi-variable proportionality equality D₁D₂ = β₁ d₁ λ₂β₂ d₂ λ₁$\frac{D_{1}}{D_{2}} = \frac{\beta_{1} d_{1} \lambda_{2}}{\beta_{2} d_{2} \lambda_{1}}$ and cancel the constant terms.
Chapter Mix
Class 12 Physics: Wave Optics
Q44jee_main_2026_23_january_eveningPolarization and Brewster's Law
When an unpolarized light falls at a particular angle on a glass plate (placed in air), it is observed that the reflected beam is linearly polarized. The angle of refracted beam with respect to the normal is ____. ( ⁻¹$\tan^{-1}$ (1.52) = 57.7°, refractive indices of air and glass are 1.00 and 1.52, respectively)
Polarization and Brewster's Law diagram for Q44 - JEE Main 2026 Evening
Linearly polarized reflected light implies the light was incident at Brewster's angle iₚ$i_p$. At Brewster's angle, the reflected and refracted rays are perpendicular to each other (iₚ + r = 90°$i_p + r = 90^{\circ}$).
Brewster's angle immediately triggers the relationship r = 90° - i$r = 90^{\circ} - i$. No complex Snell's law calculation is needed if the Brewster condition is identified from "reflected beam is linearly polarized".
Chapter Mix
Class 12 Physics: Wave Optics
Q42jee_main_2026_24_january_morningPolarization
An unpolarised light is incident at an interface of two dielectric media having refractive indices of 2 (incident medium) and 2√(3)$2\sqrt{3}$ (medium) respectively. To satisfy the condition that reflected and refracted rays are perpendicular to each other, the angle of incidence is ____.
For the reflected and refracted rays to be mutually perpendicular, the angle of incidence must equal Brewster's angle, θₚ$\theta_p$.
Using Brewster's law:
In the Young's double slit experiment the intensity produced by each one of the individual slits is I₀$I_0$ . The distance between two slits is 2 mm. The distance of screen from slits is 10 m. The wavelength of light is 6000 Å. The intensity of light on the screen in front of one of the slits is _.
where path difference phase Δ φ = (2π)/(λ) · Δ x = (2π)/(λ) · (yd)/(D)$\Delta \phi = \frac{2\pi}{\lambda} \cdot \Delta x = \frac{2\pi}{\lambda} \cdot \frac{yd}{D}$
Core Logic
Given values:
d = 2 mm = 2 × 10⁻³ m$d = 2 \text{ mm} = 2 \times 10^{-3} \text{ m}$D = 10 m$D = 10 \text{ m}$λ = 6000 AA = 6 × 10⁻⁷ m$\lambda = 6000 \text{ \AA} = 6 \times 10^{-7} \text{ m}$
Position y = (d)/(2)$y = \frac{d}{2}$ (since it is directly in front of one of the slits).
Given below are two statements :
Statement-I : A plane wave after passing through prism remains as plane wave but passing through small pin hole may become spherical wave.
Statement-II : The curvature of a spherical wave emerging from a slit will increase for increasing slit width.
In the light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below.
A.Both Statement-I and Statement-II are false.$\text{Both Statement-I and Statement-II are false.}$
B.Both Statement-I and Statement-II are true.$\text{Both Statement-I and Statement-II are true.}$
C.Statement-I is true but Statement-II is false.$\text{Statement-I is true but Statement-II is false.}$
D.Statement-I is false but Statement-II is true.$\text{Statement-I is false but Statement-II is true.}$
Statement-I is correct because a prism changes the direction of a plane wave without changing its planar wavefront nature, whereas a small pinhole acts as a point source (Huygens' principle), generating spherical wavefronts.
Statement-II is incorrect. Increasing the slit width a$a$ decreases the diffraction angle θ$\theta$ and reduces the spreading of the wave. A narrower slit produces a more pronounced spherical wave (high curvature) while a wider slit leads to a flatter, less curved (more planar) wave.
Step 1: Final Conclusion
Therefore, Statement I is true, and Statement II is false.
Pattern Recognition
Curvature of a wavefront coming out of an aperture is inversely related to aperture size relative to wavelength. Small aperture = high diffraction = highly curved spherical wave.
Chapter Mix
Class 12 Physics: Wave Optics
More Wave Optics Questions — jee_main_2025_24_jan_evening
Practice past-year questions one chapter at a time. Pick an exam → subject → chapter and get every PYQ for that topic — pulled together from all past papers — with the chapter's key formulas alongside.