Related Formula
E = hf [h] = ([E])/([f]) = ML²T⁻²T⁻¹ = ML²T⁻¹$$E = hf \implies [h] = \frac{[E]}{[f]} = \frac{\text{M}\text{L}^2\text{T}^{-2}}{\text{T}^{-1}} = \text{M}\text{L}^2\text{T}^{-1}$$
L = mvr [L] = M · (LT⁻¹) · L = ML²T⁻¹$$L = mvr \implies [L] = \text{M} \cdot (\text{L}\text{T}^{-1}) \cdot \text{L} = \text{M}\text{L}^2\text{T}^{-1}$$
L = (nh)/(2π)$$L = \frac{nh}{2\pi}$$
Core Logic
Statement I: Comparing the dimensional formula of Planck's constant (h$h$) and angular momentum (L$L$), both are identical [ML²T⁻¹]$[\text{M}\text{L}^2\text{T}^{-1}]$. Hence, Statement I is correct.
Statement II: According to Bohr's second postulate, angular momentum is an integral multiple of (h)/(2π)$\frac{h}{2\pi}$, not an integral multiple of h$h$. Hence, Statement II is incorrect.
Pattern Recognition
Watch out for exact definitions in standard postulates. Bohr's model requires angular momentum to be quantized in units of = (h)/(2π)$\hbar = \frac{h}{2\pi}$, making statement II a classic trap.
Chapter Mix
Class 11 Physics: Units and Measurements
Class 12 Physics: Atoms